The Order setting a May 24 evidentiary hearing came four months after the parties finished briefing Maricopa County's request for $141,000 in sanctions as a result of the dismissed case "to prohibit the use of electronic voting machines" in last year's elections. Judge Tuchi then found that the plaintiffs "made false, misleading, and unsupported factual assertions" when they repeatedly stated that Arizona does not use paper ballots, and authorized sanctions.
Near the end of the briefing on sanctions, Dershowitz requested that he be released from any possible penalties, claiming that he was barely involved in the case. He was listed as "of counsel" to Lake and Finchem, and (belatedly) completed an application to be permitted to practice in the Arizona court.
Judge Tuchi is allowing 90 minutes for the May 24 hearing, and stated "the Court also will question, at a minimum, Messrs. Parker and Dershowitz."
Lake, Finchem and/or their attorneys also have sanctions pending in their Election Contest cases.
"AZ Law" includes articles, commentaries and updates about opinions from the Arizona Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court, as well as trial and appellate courts, etc. AZ Law is founded by Phoenix attorney Paul Weich, and joins Arizona's Politics on the internet.
AZ Law airs on non-profit Sun Sounds of Arizona, a statewide reading service that provides audio access to printed material for people who cannot hold or read print material due to a disability. If you know someone who could benefit from this 24/7 service, please let them know about member-supported Sun Sounds. And, YOU can donate or listen here.
Previous episodes of AZ Law can be streamed or downloaded here, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm confused. It says Kari Lake is the plaintiff on the document, but the article doesn't mention that.ReplyDelete
Thats the case which Lake lost. This hearing is about awarding the payment of legal fees to the defendants in this case.Delete