Tuesday, March 28, 2023

BREAKING, IRONY: Finchem Asks Judge To Deny Fontes Sanctions Because Of Timeliness; Meanwhile, State Separately Asks For $7,500 Sanctions (READ Filings)

In a pot-and-kettle situation, former Secretary of State candidate Mark Finchem is (incorrectly) urging the court to deny any sanctions against him and/or his attorney because the Adrian Fontes' Motion was filed two days late. Meanwhile, attorneys for the Secretary of State's Office filed their request for $7,500 in sanctions in Finchem's failed Election Contest.

Unfortunately for Finchem, the basis for yesterday's Objection (below) is that Superior Court Judge Melissa Iyer Julian asked for sanctions motion(s) to be filed "within 10 days". Opposing counsel correctly - under court rules - read that to mean 10 court days, instead of 10 calendar days. The Christmas court holiday also did not count. So, the December 28 Motion was filed well within the deadline imposed by the judge's December 16 Minute Entry. (You also do not count the day the Order was filed.)

The irony comes into play in light of Finchem and his attorney's inability to keep the appeal of the dismissal moving in a timely manner. Arizona's Law has documented how Finchem's zombie appeal is only "alive" (moving forward) because the courts and opposing counsel have permitted untimely filings.

Finchem also suggests - in both yesterday's Opposition and his previous Motion for Reconsideration - that Judge Julian should not award contestee Fontes' attorneys' fees because they were initially paid by a third party. (Sanctions are not solely designed to reimburse whoever paid for the attorneys' fees; they are also to penalize the party that was using the court system to push a groundless claim (or defense) in bad faith.)

Because the Election Contest was dismissed by the trial court judge relatively quickly, the costs and attorneys' fees incurred by then-Secretary of State Katie Hobbs' office were only $7,525.58. That filing is also below.

Judge Julian now has the Motion for Sanctions and Finchem's Motion for Reconsideration in front of her. The Court of Appeals is awaiting briefing on Finchem's appeal - the Opening Brief is due April 7. 

"AZ Law" includes articles, commentaries and updates about opinions from the Arizona Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court, as well as trial and appellate courts, etc. AZ Law is founded by Phoenix attorney Paul Weich, and joins Arizona's Politics on the internet. 

AZ Law airs on non-profit Sun Sounds of Arizona, a statewide reading service that provides audio access to printed material for people who cannot hold or read print material due to a disability. If you know someone who could benefit from this 24/7 service, please let them know about member-supported Sun Sounds. And, YOU can donate or listen here. 

Previous episodes of AZ Law can be streamed or downloaded here, or wherever you get your podcasts.

1 comment:

  1. On March 28th, Finchem filed a new "Notice of supplemental authority and evidence in support" of his motion to reconsider. Would you know where I can find a link to that.
    (oddly enough, the following day Finchem's lawyers claimed that the Bob Hughes declaration was "inadvertently" missing from the March 28th filing. even more oddly, Hughes only signed that declaration on March 29.. the day AFTER it was "inadvertently missing".)

    ReplyDelete

BREAKING: Abe Hamadeh and Attorney Again Try Double-Barreled Approach To Reversing 2022 Election, File Appeal and Special Action

Abe Hamadeh is campaigning for a Congressional seat, while he is still legally campaigning to have (multiple) courts reverse the 2022 electi...