Monday, November 9, 2020

NOT SO FAST, BUT FASTER: AZ Secy/State Tries To Block "Sharpiegate" Dismissal To Expedite Trump Campaign Lawsuit

UPDATE, 12:15pm: Judge Mahoney denied the Secretary of State's motion to consolidate the two cases and to not dismiss the Sharpiegate case. More details and the ruling itself can be found here

The legal maneuvering surrounding Arizona's ballot counting for the Presidential race kicked into high gear over the weekend, as Arizona's Secretary of State tried to block the Plaintiff in the so-called Sharpiegate lawsuit from voluntarily dismissing their case hours before the Trump campaign filed a new suit alleging irregularities.

The Sharpiegate notice of dismissal came Saturday afternoon, shortly after Superior Court Judge Margaret Mahoney had issued a scheduling order that would move the case along quickly without discovery.* That was quickly followed by the new case filed by the Trump campaign (and the national and Arizona Republican parties).

Sunday night, attorneys for Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs moved to block the Sharpiegate dismissal and to consolidate it with the Trump suit. They noted that the issues significantly overlap and that that would be the most efficient way to resolve these issues. (The Trump lawsuit takes the Sharpie bleed-through issue a step forward and alleges that poll workers did not properly advise voters how to handle ballots the tabulating machines flagged.)

The Secretary of State's pleading (below) notes that the RNC had filed a proposed Answer to the Sharpiegate lawsuit when they asked to intervene, and that the Answer was accepted the moment Judge Mahoney allowed both political parties to intervene. Consolidating the two lawsuits would expedite the matter because the same parties would not have to start from square one in front of a new judge.

(Not surprisingly, the conservative legal group behind the Sharpiegate suit this morning asked to intervene in the Trump campaign's lawsuit.)

Hobbs Move to Block Dismissal of Sharpiegate, Consolidate by arizonaspolitics on Scribd


*Normally, a plaintiff can dismiss a case without approval of other parties or the judge if no one has filed an Answer to their Complaint.

"AZ Law" includes articles, commentaries and updates about opinions from the Arizona Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court, as well as trial and appellate courts, etc.

AZ Law airs on non-profit Sun Sounds of Arizona, a statewide reading service that provides audio access to printed material for people who cannot hold or read print material due to a disability. If you know someone who could benefit from this 24/7 service, please let them know about member-supported Sun Sounds. And, YOU can donate or listen here. 

Previous episodes of AZ Law can be streamed or downloaded here, or wherever you get your podcasts.

No comments:

Post a Comment

BREAKING: Monday Morning Hearing On AZGOP Contest of Arizona's Presidential Election (READ pleadings); GOP Works With Trump Campaign, Targets Heavily Mormon Area

 There will be a Monday morning hearing on the likely legal contest challenging Arizona's Presidential election, filed by the Chairwoman...